|
Bela Bartok: The Six String Quartets | 
 enlarge | Creators: Bela Bartok, Juilliard String Quartet, Earl Carlyss, Joel Krosnick, Samuel Rhodes, Robert Mann
Label: Sony
Category: Music
Buy New: $24.99
New (2) Used (7) Collectible (1) from $12.95
Avg. Customer Rating:  6 reviews
Sales Rank: 30537
Format: Box Set
Media: Audio CD
Discs: 2
UPC: 074646323427
EAN: 0074646323427
ASIN: B0000029YN
Release Date: November 18, 1997
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Tracks:
Disc 1
| • | 1. Lento | | • | 2. Allegretto | | • | 3. Introduzione: Allegro; Allegro vivace | | • | 1. Moderato | | • | 2. Allegro molto capriccioso | | • | 3. Lento | | • | Prima parte: Moderato | | • | Seconda parte: Allegro | | • | Ricapitulazione della prima parte: Moderato | | • | Coda: Allegro molto | | • | 1. Allegro |
Disc 2
| • | 2. Prestissimo, con sordino | | • | 3. Non troppo lento | | • | 4. Allegretto pizzicato | | • | 5. Allegro molto | | • | 1. Allegro | | • | 2. Adagio molto | | • | 3. Scherzo: Alla bulgarese | | • | 4. Andante | | • | 5. Finale: Allegro vivace | | • | 1. Mesto; Vivace | | • | 2. Mesto; Marcia | | • | 3. Mesto; Burletta: Moderato | | • | 4. Mesto |
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com essential recording
The Juilliard Quartet burst upon the international musical scene in the 1950s with a series of acclaimed performances of the six Bartok string quartets. Five decades later they are still renowned for their performances of this music, and no one interested in this superb group can afford to pass up this set, digitally recorded in 1981 and now available at budget price. These quartets have been very frequently recorded over the years, but few more recent versions match the Juilliard in terms of both interpretive and technical excellence. --David Hurwitz
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 1 more reviews...
 Compositions: Outstanding! Performance: Mixed. June 4, 2007
These are great pieces of music and the Juilliard Quartet performs the slow movements beautifully. The fast movements are accurate, but lacking impact. The recording quality is fairly good. Bela Bartok: The 6 String Quartets - Emerson String Quartet does a better job of the fast movements, but not as well on the slow movements. I would recommend the Hungarian String Quartet Bartok: 6 String Quartets recording instead.
P.S. I saw the Juilliard String Quartet perform Bartok's 5th string quartet in 2005 and it was phenomenal. I'm just reviewing the recording here, not today's quartet!
 Doesn't compare to the 1963 Juilliard version November 10, 2003
13 out of 14 found this review helpful
It is a shame that the 1981 Juilliard cycle has been the only available Juilliard cycle for some time, because it is by far the weakest of the three. Sure, it is a relatively cheap CD set, but I don't really feel it is worth the money. The playing, compared to the Juilliard's incomparable 1963 recording, is positively anemic. The sound quality also leaves a lot to be desired. Overall, this is an unsatisfying listening experience.If you want the 1963 Juilliard version, good luck. It is available only as an import, and is generally a challenge to acquire. The same can be said of the Alban Berg Quartett cycle. Probably the best domestically available version would be the Emerson Quartet's cycle. Some people may be thinking that they are getting the 1963 version with this CD set. Don't be fooled --- this version is significantly inferior and should definitely not be your first choice.
 Beautiful music, poor rendition August 5, 2003
4 out of 9 found this review helpful
It has been said that Bartok's string quartets together are the best thing to happen to classical music since Beethoven's string quartets. There are many wonderful quartets out there performing these quartets, but this recording by the Juilliard Quartet just doesn't rank up there. I swear by the Emerson Quartet's rendition on Deutsche Grammophon which has wonderful recording quality and an amazing performance. I've heard the Takacs Quartet live and they indeed have their own wonderful way of interpreting the music that's different from the Emerson Quartet. I'd recommend either quartet's work heartily over the Juilliard's version, which is thin, lifeless, and simply unsatisfying. Don't think you're saving money -- you'll just end up buying one of the better versions anyway!
Julliard interprets Bartok's works excellently December 10, 2002
0 out of 2 found this review helpful
There are better interpretations of these seminal works available -- Takacs Quartet and Emerson Quartet do excellent versions, I'm told -- but for someone on a budget who would love to hear six great, innovative string quartets, you can't beat this disc.A two-disc set recorded in 1981 by the famed Julliard String Quartet, this collection takes what are considered by many to be the finest string quartets ever written and gives them a clear, beautiful interpretation. While the first two (and last) quartets are quiet and contemplative, things get really exciting in the middle portion, with 3, 4 and 5 bristling with energy and tension. This is "modern" classical at its finest. Julliard shows why Bartok was such a revered composer. If you want to go all out and get the aforementioned Takacs or Emerson versions, I'm sure you'll be sonically rewarded. But two excellent discs for under $15 is a great deal.
a neoclassical reading at a bargain price August 16, 2001
10 out of 11 found this review helpful
Bartok composed the great string quartet cycle of the early 20th century. Of the various available recordings, this Juilliard from 1981 has one obvious advantage -- it's cheaper. By all means, listen, it's a fine version, but you'll never know what you're missing if you don't hear the Takacs Quartet's "gypsy" version! The 3rd, 4th, and 5th quartets are sheer modernist genius. The 1st and 2nd are less innovative -- the 1st is in the romantic tradition. The 6th is calm and tragic, written as Bartok prepared to leave Hungary for the USA. Here are some comparisons between the Juilliard and Takacs recordings -- an advantage of the Juilliard is that the quartets are in order, while the Takacs changes the order. The resulting disadvantage of the Juilliard is that #4 is split. The Juilliard has perfunctory liner notes, while the Takacs has superb, extensive liner notes describing each piece and how it was written. As for the music, these are very different interpretations. The Juilliard Quartet sounds quite neoclassical -- light, even thin, restrained, and emphasizing the ensemble more than individual lines. In dramatic contrast, the Takacs Quartet sounds rougher, earthier, "gypsy" -- they are heavier, thicker, more passionate, and sound more like four individuals playing together than a unified ensemble. So far, a matter of interpretation. Both are valid, and the differences highlight the rich potential of the scores. BUT, there is a serious problem with the Juilliard, and that is why I give it only 4 stars -- the recording seems to slight the bass end, with a faint cello. The Juilliard recording of Carter's quartets doesn't suffer from this problem, and so I have to conclude that the problem is in the recording, not the playing. The recording of the Takacs disc is superb and balanced, and is probably partly responsible for the sound of four distinct lines. If you enjoy these quartets, listen to the great string quartet cycle of the late 20th century by Elliot Carter!
|
|
|
|
